Pengolahan Air Terproduksi Berbasis Teknologi Hybrid Sebagai Upaya Mitigasi Risiko Bahaya Lingkungan dan K3 di PT XYZ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25311/keskom.Vol11.Iss3.2383Abstrak
Air terproduksi merupakan limbah utama dari kegiatan eksplorasi dan produksi minyak dan gas bumi yang mengandung senyawa organik dan anorganik berbahaya seperti fenol, amonia, sulfida, serta minyak dan lemak yang berpotensi mencemari lingkungan dan menimbulkan risiko terhadap keselamatan serta kesehatan kerja (K3), khususnya akibat paparan gas H₂S dan amonia. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas teknologi hybride (kombinasi pengolahan secara fisika, kimia dan biologi) dalam meningkatkan kinerja pengolahan air terproduksi di lokasi PT XYZ serta menilai kontribusinya terhadap pemenuhan baku mutu lingkungan dan mitigasi risiko K3. Desain penelitian meliputi uji laboratorium dan simulasi pilot plant melalui proses aerasi, koagulasi–flokulasi, aerasi biologis, dan filtrasi. Sebanyak 153 sampel inlet dan outlet dikumpulkan secara composite sampling selama April–Agustus 2025 dan dianalisis untuk parameter temperatur, pH, Minyak & Lemak, COD, Fenol, Sulfida, dan Amonia. Hasil menunjukkan teknologi hybrid mampu menurunkan Minyak & Lemak, COD, Fenol, Amonias dan Sulfida lebih dari 80%, sehingga efluen memenuhi Permen LHK No. 19 Tahun 2010. Sistem ini terbukti efektif, aman secara operasional, dan mendukung keberlanjutan lingkungan. Penelitian lanjutan disarankan mencakup analisis logam berat dan mikro-pollutants untuk memperoleh gambaran pengolahan yang lebih komprehensif.
Unduhan
Referensi
[1] M. Abu-Orf, G. Tchobanoglous, H. D. Stensel, R. (Author, F. (Author, and B. Pfrang, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery. 2023.
[2] H. D. Dawoud, H. Saleem, N. A. Alnuaimi, and S. J. Zaidi, “Characterization and treatment technologies applied for produced water in Qatar,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 24, 2021, doi: 10.3390/w13243573.
[3] M. Vakili, P. Koutník, and J. Kohout, “Addressing Hydrogen Sulfide Corrosion in Oil and Gas Industries: A Sustainable Perspective,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 16, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16041661.
[4] Y. Ibrahim and N. Hilal, “Enhancing ultrafiltration membrane permeability and antifouling performance through surface patterning with features resembling feed spacers,” NPJ Clean Water, vol. 6, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41545-023-00277-3.
[5] J. Xu, H. Wang, Z. Zhou, and Z. Zou, “Ferromagnetic properties of N-doped and undoped TiO2 rutile single-crystal wafers with addition of tungsten trioxide,” Materials, vol. 11, no. 10, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ma11101934.
[6] S. Alzahrani and A. W. Mohammad, “Challenges and trends in membrane technology implementation for produced water treatment: A review,” Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 4, no. C, pp. 107–133, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2014.09.007.
[7] D. C. Da Silva, C. Lucas, H. Borges de Moraes Juviniano, M. Moura, A. Dantas Neto, and T. Dantas, “Novel produced water treatment using microemulsion systems to remove oil contents,” Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 33, p. 101006, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101006.
[8] R. Azeez and F. Al-Zuhairi, “Bio-Treatment Technologies of Produced Water: A Review,” Engineering and Technology Journal, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1–15, 2022, doi: 10.30684/etj.2022.131480.1040.
[9] A. Fakhru’l-Razi, A. Pendashteh, L. C. Abdullah, D. R. A. Biak, S. S. Madaeni, and Z. Z. Abidin, “Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment,” J Hazard Mater, vol. 170, no. 2–3, pp. 530–551, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.044.
[10] Y. Gong, X. Zhao, Z. Cai, S. E. O’Reilly, X. Hao, and D. Zhao, “A review of oil, dispersed oil and sediment interactions in the aquatic environment: Influence on the fate, transport and remediation of oil spills,” Mar Pollut Bull, vol. 79, no. 1–2, pp. 16–33, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.12.024.
[11] C. Li, J. Li, N. Wang, Q. Zhao, and P. Wang, “Status of the treatment of produced water containing polymer in oilfields: A review,” J Environ Chem Eng, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 105303, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105303.
[12] C. Abdelhamid, A. Latrach, M. Rabiei, and K. Venugopal, “Produced Water Treatment Technologies : A Review,” 2025.
[13] American Public Health Association and American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation, “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,” in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Washington, D.C.: American Public Health Association, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.standardmethods.org
[14] J. A. Veil, Produced Water Management Options and Technologies. 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0046-2_29.
[15] S. Jiménez, M. M. Micó, M. Arnaldos, F. Medina, and S. Contreras, “State of the art of produced water treatment,” Chemosphere, vol. 192, pp. 186–208, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.139.
[16] A. Simões, R. Macêdo-Júnior, B. Santos, L. Silva, D. Silva, and D. Ruzene, “Produced Water: An overview of treatment technologies,” Int J Innov Educ Res, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 207–224, 2020, doi: 10.31686/ijier.vol8.iss4.2283.
[17] R. Etchepare, H. Oliveira, A. Azevedo, and J. Rubio, “Separation of emulsified crude oil in saline water by dissolved air flotation with micro and nanobubbles,” Sep Purif Technol, vol. 186, pp. 326–332, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.06.007.
[18] F. Salem and T. Thiemann, “Produced Water from Oil and Gas Exploration—Problems, Solutions and Opportunities,” J Water Resour Prot, vol. 14, no. 02, pp. 142–185, 2022, doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2022.142009.
[19] V. K. Gupta, I. Ali, T. A. Saleh, A. Nayak, and S. Agarwal, “Chemical treatment technologies for waste-water recycling - An overview,” RSC Adv, vol. 2, no. 16, pp. 6380–6388, 2019, doi: 10.1039/c2ra20340e.
[20] A. C. Klemz et al., “Oilfield produced water treatment by liquid-liquid extraction: A review,” J Pet Sci Eng, vol. 199, no. November 2020, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108282.
[21] T. E. Aniyikaiye, T. Oluseyi, J. O. Odiyo, and J. N. Edokpayi, “Physico-chemical analysis of wastewater discharge from selected paint industries in Lagos, Nigeria,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 16, no. 7, 2019, doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071235.
[22] W. Jiang et al., “A critical review of analytical methods for comprehensive characterization of produced water,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–29, 2021, doi: 10.3390/w13020183.
[23] F. Nath, M. O. S. Chowdhury, and M. M. Rhaman, “Navigating Produced Water Sustainability in the Oil and Gas Sector: A Critical Review of Reuse Challenges, Treatment Technologies, and Prospects Ahead,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 15, no. 23, 2023, doi: 10.3390/w15234088.
[24] J. A. Veil, M. G. Puder, D. Elcock, and R. J. Jr. Redweik, “A White Paper Describing Produced Water from Production of Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Coal Bed Methane. Prepared by: Argonne National Laboratory. Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Under Contract W-31-109-Eng-38,” Argonne National Laboratory report, prepare for U.S Department of Energy and National Energy Technology laboratory, no. January, p. 87, 2024, [Online]. Available: http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/821666/%0Ahttp://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/prodwaterpaper1.pdf
[25] W. Jiang and L. Chen, “Alternative splicing: Human disease and quantitative analysis from high-throughput sequencing,” Comput Struct Biotechnol J, vol. 19, pp. 183–195, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.12.009.
[26] L. Stroud, E. Green, and J. Cronje, “A Revision Process That Bridges Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment,” pp. 436–444, 2020, doi: 10.4236/psych.2020.113029.
[27] S. Madan, R. Madan, and A. Hussain, “Advancement in biological wastewater treatment using hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR): a review,” Appl Water Sci, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1–13, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13201-022-01662-y.
[28] M. A. Al-Ghouti, M. A. Al-Kaabi, M. Y. Ashfaq, and D. A. Da’na, “Produced water characteristics, treatment and reuse: A review,” Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 28, no. January, pp. 222–239, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.02.001.
[29] J. Xu, Q. Cui, C. Bu, S. Ismail, and S. Q. Ni, “Partition of Anammox and Nitrifiers Through Bio-Carriers for Full-Scale Sidestream Partial Nitrification–Anammox Plant,” Front Bioeng Biotechnol, vol. 10, no. March, pp. 1–9, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.819937.
[30] PERMENLHK, “Permen No.19 thn 2010-BMAL MIGAS,” Peraturan Menteri Negara Lingkungan Hidup Tentang Baku Mutu Air Limbah Bagi Usaha Dan/Atau Kegiatan Minyak Dan Gas Serta Panas Bumi, pp. 1–12, 2010.
[31] P. Zahreddine and S. Nepal, “Innovative Nutrient Removal Technologies – Case Studies of Intensified or Enhanced Treatment,” 94th Annual Water Environment Federation Technical Exhibition and Conference, WEFTEC 2021, no. August, pp. 891–907, 2021.
[32] Y. Yang et al., “Ecological risk assessment and environment carrying capacity of soil pesticide residues in vegetable ecosystem in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area,” J Hazard Mater, vol. 435, p. 128987, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2022.128987.
[33] L. Tang et al., “Knockout of OsNRAMP5 enhances rice tolerance to cadmium toxicity in response to varying external cadmium concentrations via distinct mechanisms,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 832, no. March, p. 155006, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155006.
[34] Y. Yang et al., “Ecological risk assessment and environment carrying capacity of soil pesticide residues in vegetable ecosystem in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area,” J Hazard Mater, vol. 435, p. 128987, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128987.
[35] E. H. Khader, N. S. Abbood, T. N. Albyati, and T. J. Mohammed, “Performance evaluation of integral process for treatment of oilfield wastewater,” AIP Conf Proc, vol. 2443, no. July, 2022, doi: 10.1063/5.0091914.
[36] I. M. Chohan, A. Ahmad, N. Sallih, N. Bheel, W. M. Salilew, and A. H. Almaliki, “Effect of seawater salinity, pH, and temperature on external corrosion behavior and microhardness of offshore oil and gas pipeline: RSM modelling and optimization,” Sci Rep, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67463-2.
[37] M. Baikousi et al., “Hydrogen Sulfide Removal via Sorption Process on Activated Carbon–Metal Oxide Composites Derived from Different Biomass Sources,” Molecules, vol. 28, no. 21, 2023, doi: 10.3390/molecules28217418.
[38] T. U. Rahman et al., “The Advancement in Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) Technology toward Sustainable Industrial Wastewater Management,” Membranes (Basel), vol. 13, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.3390/membranes13020181.
[39] ACGIH, TLVs and BEIs: Based on the Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents & Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, Ohio: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2023. Available: https://www.acgih.org/science/tlv-bei-guidelines/
[40] J. Meng, S. Shen, C. Zhou, T. Zhang, and Y. Xu, “Optimization pilot scale study on ammonia nitrogen removal by bio filter,” Sci Rep, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42885-6.
[41] S. H. Lee et al., “Identification of serum metabolic signatures of environmental-leveled phthalate in the Taiwanese child population using NMR-based metabolomics,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 316, p. 120454, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2022.120454.
[42] W. Zhu, C. Duan, and B. Chen, “Energy-pollutant nexus for wastewater treatment in China based on multi-regional input-output analysis,” J Clean Prod, vol. 363, p. 132490, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.132490.
Unduhan
Telah diserahkan
diterima
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Jurnal Kesehatan Komunitas
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright @2017. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial used, distribution and reproduction in any medium
