Health Technology Assessment untuk Alat Kesehatan: Scoping Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25311/keskom.Vol8.Iss3.1332Kata Kunci:
alat kesehatan, HTA, kriteriaAbstrak
Banyaknya teknologi kesehatan yang tersedia saat ini, menyebabkan adanya kebutuhan terkait penilaian pada berbagai aspek. Penilaian tersebut biasa disebut dengan Health Technology Assessment (HTA). HTA adalah evaluasi secara sistematis, efek, dan/atau dampak dari teknologi kesehatan yang bertujuan untuk memberikan informasi kepada pembuat kebijakan yang berhubungan dengan teknologi kesehatan, dengan demikian dapat meminimalkan biaya dan mencegah penggunaan teknologi yang diragukan. HTA telah banyak digunakan dalam melakukan penilaian terhadap teknologi kesehatan. Teknologi kesehatan yang dimaksud dapat berupa obat-obatan, terapi, prosedur tindakan medis, maupun alat kesehatan. Proses dan metodologi HTA untuk obat-obatan telah banyak dilakukan sedangkan untuk alat kesehatan masih jarang. Dari beberapa literatur review yang dilakukan sebelumnya, penggunaan kriteria HTA berbeda-beda meskipun objeknya alat kesehatan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui mengenai kriteria apa saja yang sering digunakan pada HTA untuk alat kesehatan medis. Metode penelitian scoping review pada publikasi HTA sebelumnya (n=392) dilakukan untuk membahas tujuan tersebut dengan menggunakan database Pubmed dan Science Direct. Berdasarkan hasil pencarian literatur dengan menggunakan PRISMA, didapatkan 7 artikel sesuai dengan kriteria inklusi yang berhubungan dengan HTA untuk alat kesehatan dengan subjek yang berbeda, yaitu: alat kesehatan dan HTA berbasis rumah sakit. Kesimpulan dari hasil temuan tersebut, diketahui bahwa kriteria yang sering digunakan dalam HTA untuk alat kesehatan yaitu, ekonomi, keamanan, efektivitas, dan organisasi. Saran penelitian ini adalah hasil kriteria yang didapatkan divalidasi terlebih dahulu oleh ahlinya atau stakeholder.
Unduhan
Referensi
Alami, H., Lehoux, P., Auclair, Y., & De, M. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Health Technology Assessment : Anticipating a New Level of Complexity. 22, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2196/17707
Alfadesta, Aprilianto, Danny Handoko, F.S. Rifano, & Isa, S. M. (2011). Penerapan M-Health Untuk Diagnostics and Treatment Support Pada Negara Berkembang: Studi Kasus Indonesia. 62–68.
Arksey, H., Malley, L. O., Arksey, H., & Malley, L. O. (2007). Scoping studies : towards a methodological framework Scoping Studies : Towards a Methodological Framework. December 2014, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Artun, E. D., & Şahin, B. (2021). Evaluation of the Availability of Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment in Public and Private Hospitals in Turkey: Ankara Province Sample. Value in Health Regional Issues, 25, 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2021.03.004
Baghbanian, A., Merlin, T., Carter, D., & Wang, S. (2020). Methods for the health technology assessment of complex interventions: A protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open, 10(11), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039263
Blüher, M., Saunders, S. J., Mittard, V., Torrejon Torres, R., Davis, J. A., & Saunders, R. (2019). Critical Review of European Health-Economic Guidelines for the Health Technology Assessment of Medical Devices. Frontiers in Medicine, 6(November), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00278
Busse, R., Orvain, J., Velasco, M., Perleth, M., Drummond, M., G¨rtner, F., Jørgensen, T., Jovell, A., Malone, J., R¨ther, A., & Wild, C. (2002). Best Practice in Undertaking and Reporting Health Technology Assessments. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 18(2), 361–422. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462302000284
EUnetHTA Joint Action. (2016). HTA Core Model Handbook. In EUnetHTA Joint Action 2. https://www.eunethta.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/HTACoreModel3.0-1.pdf%0Ahttp://www.corehta.info
Ferguson, M. (2014). Medical devices are different to pharmaceuticals in the Health Technology Assessment process. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 3(3), 217–219. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer.14.17
Haverinen, J., Keränen, N., Falkenbach, P., Maijala, A., Kolehmainen, T., & Reponen, J. (2019). Digi-HTA: Health technology assessment framework for digital healthcare services. Finnish Journal of EHealth and EWelfare, 11(4), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.23996/fjhw.82538
Hill, S., Velazquez, A., Tay-Teo, K., & Metherell, A. (2015). 2015 Global Survey on Health Technology Assessment by National Authorities. In Who. www.who.int%0Awww.who.int/about/licens-ing/copyright_form/en/index.html
Hummel, J. M., Borsci, S., & Fico, G. (2020). Multicriteria decision aiding for early health technology assessment of medical devices. In Clinical Engineering Handbook (Second Edi). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-813467-2.00114-0
Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2017). Buku Panduan Penilaian Teknologi Kesehatan. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 118–120.
Kristensen, F. B. (2005). Introduction to miniHTA.
Magrabi, F., Ong, M. S., Runciman, W., & Coiera, E. (2012). Using FDA reports to inform a classification for health information technology safety problems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000369
Martelli, N., Hansen, P., van den Brink, H., Boudard, A., Cordonnier, A. L., Devaux, C., Pineau, J., Prognon, P., & Borget, I. (2016). Combining multi-criteria decision analysis and mini-health technology assessment: A funding decision-support tool for medical devices in a university hospital setting. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 59, 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBI.2015.12.002
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Guidelines and Guidance Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Moore, F., Grunch, B. H., Miller, L. E., & Musacchio, M. J. (2021). Towards a More Simplified Approach for Evaluating Strength of Evidence in Health Technology Assessments. Cureus, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16528
Mueller, D., Pattinson, R. C., Hlongwane, T. M., Busse, R., & Panteli, D. (2021). Portable continuous wave Doppler ultrasound for primary healthcare in South Africa: can the EUnetHTA Core Model guide evaluation before technology adoption? Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 19(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-021-00261-z
Olberg, B., Fuchs, S., Panteli, D., Perleth, M., & Busse, R. (2017). Scientific Evidence in Health Technology Assessment Reports: An In-Depth Analysis of European Assessments on High-Risk Medical Devices. Value in Health, 20(10), 1420–1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.011
Rosina, J., Rogalewicz, V., Ivlev, I., Juřičková, I., Donin, G., Jantosová, N., Vacek, J., Otawová, R., & Kneppo, P. (2014). Health technology assessment for medical devices. Lekar a Technika, 44(3), 23–36.
Sampietro-Colom L, L. K., Cicchetti A, K. K., Pasternack I, F. B., Rosenmöller M, W. C., Kahveci R, W. J., & Kiivet RA, et al. (2015). THE AdHopHTA HANDBOOK. http://www.adhophta.eu/sites/files/adhophta/media/adhophta_handbook_website.pdf
Tarricone, R., Amatucci, F., Armeni, P., Banks, H., Borsoi, L., Callea, G., Ciani, O., Costa, F., Federici, C., Torbica, A., & Marletta, M. (2021). Establishing a national HTA program for medical devices in Italy: Overhauling a fragmented system to ensure value and equal access to new medical technologies. Health Policy, 125(5), 602–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.03.003
WHO. (2011). Health Technology Assessment of Medical Devices. In Regulation.
WHO. (2015). WHO | Why use HTA? Who. https://www.who.int/health-technology-assessment/about/WHY/en/
Unduhan
Telah diserahkan
diterima
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2023 Jurnal Kesehatan Komunitas
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright @2017. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial used, distribution and reproduction in any medium
